Posted by: Gregoryno6 | June 8, 2021

The tide continues to rise.

Victoria: ‘fleeting transmission’ gets up and, well, flees.

And from the offices of No Shit, Sherlock Incorporated:

Driss Ait Ouakrim, Ameera Katar and Tony Blakely from the University of Melbourne have questioned whether the current hotel-based quarantine system is as “fit for purpose” as federal government officials say it is.

They have argued that it is not, in fact, “serving Australia very well”.

And from the international desk: Martin Kulldorff is unusually brave for a Harvard person.

Opposition to lockdowns had been deemed unscientific. When scientists spoke out against lockdowns, they were ignored, considered a fringe voice, or accused of not having proper credentials. We thought it would be hard to ignore something authored by three senior infectious-disease epidemiologists from what were three respectable universities. We were right. All hell broke loose. That was good.

 


Responses

  1. “Fleeting transmission”? Huh. Sounds like a problem I had with my Plymouth Superbird back in the early ’70s. Gear kept slipping into second.

    Say, what kind of hotels do they quarantine people in over there, anyway?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Categories

%d bloggers like this: